Overview
Decentralized Science (DeSci) is a topic that has seen a strong growth in interest in the first part of 2022. There are a lot of exciting projects and activities coming together to explore how to improve science with web3. As part of that, there’s a question of where some long tail discussions around DeSci can take place. This presents the SCRF community with an opportunity to add a section to the forum to house some of this conversation. This would also entail needing to bring on additional resources to support the engagement and moderation for this section.
Questions
The idea came up to add a section on the forum for ‘Decentralized Science’ or ‘DeSci.’ As part of this, we need to consider:
- Should we add a section to the forum for this topic
- If yes, what types of posts do we want (are thoughts on desci ok? Project overviews? How are you using web3? What problems are being solved in DeSci?)
- What types of posts are not allowed?
- Community discussions
- Governance decisions
- What additional resources need to be added to ensure that this section remains active?
The benefits
There are two ways to explore the benefits, one is to the DeSci community and the other is to the SCRF community. For the DeSci community, this could provide a forum with operational support related to it to house long-tail discussions around DeSci. This could also provide an opportunity to extend some writing grants to DeSci community members and could extend an opportunity or two for part-time work supporting the DeSci section.
The drawbacks
Two main drawbacks come to mind. One is that this is an application domain of web3, not a research domain area. Would adding a section on the forum that calls for non research related content too distracting from our core mission? Is there a way to provide clarity on what content is sought after on the forum to find a middle ground?
The other is whether this adds operational strain to the content or engagement teams. If yes, is it possible to bring on one or two people for part-time grants to support engagement or content?
My personal view
I know I’m biased, but I do think that providing this resource could be valuable to both the broad DeSci community and to the SCRF community. I think it would make sense to engage 1-2 people to support with this new section (already speaking to one person on it). I also think we would have to provide some focus to posts (e.g. what is DeSci, what problems are being addressed, how are web3 tools being used). I do NOT think general DeSci governance decisions (aka should the DeSci community plan something for a specific conference).
Discussion
What do people think about the above questions?